Cross Site Authentication and Data Transfer
page 1 of 7
Published: 19 Dec 2007
Abstract
In this article Tom presents a methodology for cross web site authentication (form authentication) and data transfer using ASP.NET 2.0, SQL Server 2005, web services, and Microsoft Enterprise Library.
by Tom Zhang
Feedback
Average Rating: This article has not yet been rated.
Views (Total / Last 10 Days): 5301/ 208

Introduction

With the increasing need of using third party services, such as e-commerce, convention registration, web content management, etc., transferring user (customer) data from our database to a third party service provider becomes more frequent and more complicated. Due to different data storage infrastructures and security restrictions, there is no direct communication between our database and the third party database. One way to transfer data is to develop a scheduled data sync process which generates data files (text files) and sends our data to the third party at certain time interval. This seems to be straight forward and simple. But it has several fundamental issues as listed below that cannot be easily resolved.

·         Sooner or later Data becomes out of sync.

·         Changes occurring in our database cannot be transferred to the third party until the next scheduled run. Therefore, the third party database is not up to date.

·         There is a need to create a different data transfer mechanism for each third party due to different business requirements. It is difficult to manage the multiple data sync processes.

·         Each third party has its own authentication process. Our users end up with several sets of user names and passwords. This is inconvenient for users and often confusing.

Cross site authentication (form authentication) and data transfer use a “single sign-on” approach in which the user is always brought to our authentication site to sign on. After being successfully authenticated, the user is then redirected to a third party site where the third party application calls our authentication web service to confirm the user’s authentication status and to retrieve a complete set of user data to update its database.

In this article I will share one methodology using ASP.NET form authentication with the development communities. Certainly there are better ways to do this than what I am about to discuss here. Please feel free to send your feedbacks. I would like to learn from you as well.


View Entire Article

Article Feedback

Title:  
Name:  
Url: ( Optional )
Comment:  
Please add 5 and 7 and type the answer here:

User Comments

Title: Why redirecting when using a webservice?   
Name: Tom Z
Date: 2/6/2008 11:49:50 AM
Comment:
Hi Dave,
Thanks for your invaluable input on this topic.

No doubt that a third party can consume the web service to authenticate a user directly without going to a centralized authentication site as introduced in this article. The reasons that I choose not to do it that way include the following:
- Minimize the amount of work that a third party has to do for authentication and data transfer;
- Reduce the complexity related to finding an existing record and creating a new record. An existing user does not initially reside in the third party database (only in our database). It will be a complicated process (or a lengthy process) for the third party app to find a user in our database through web service calls. If the “finding” process is not implemented, all existing users in our database would become “new” users at the third party site. When creating a new record, the third party not only needs to create a record for itself but also to collect additional information for our specific needs and then exports this record into our database. For example, let’s say the main business type of a user is required in our database, the third party has to create this field in its database, even though it does not need this information at all.

Regarding the length of URL as well as redirecting user between authentication site and a third party site, you have valid points. However, this method is intended to be used among business partners with “trusted” relationship. The issues can be resolved through the partnership.

Thinking of Windows Live solution, would that be similar to this? The difference is that Windows Live only does authentication while this method does both authentication and data transfer. In addition, Windows Live may not need web service calls (I guess) during authentication since “Live” components come with the Windows installation.

Regards,
Tom
Title: Why redirecting when using a webservice?   
Name: Dave
Date: 2/1/2008 7:05:05 PM
Comment:
It might sound silly, why not letting the third party websites consuming the webservice AuthenticationService.asmx?

It also has some other benefits:
- The user won't be redirected to another website
- you can return all kind of information, not needed to encrypt it.
- The authentication srevice itself can be secured by passing a SiteID an a pre-shared key. Other method is IP-based access.
- No problems redirecting from HTTPS (I assume registration / login is done over SSL!) to http and browser security warnings. Because the login page is on the website self, it makes much more sense to purchase a SSL certificate.

Of course you need to implemented a few pages such as registration, forget/change password, logout etc. But the authentication 'website' doesn't need to implement a new masterpage for each site which wants to use the service.

Another issues which might can be a problem is the use of EncryptedData in the url. More and more webservers have limits on the values of a query-string parameter. Because the returned information set can become very large, it might cause problems. On our webservers (both IIS and Apache) the maximum limit of query string parameters is set to 128 bytes. Exceeding the limit results in a 414 Request-URI too long.

Another issue, partly raised earlier, is that your sending the visitor to an website where it doesn't want to be. These days there are a lot of phissing websites. Redirecting a visitor from www.example.org to www.loginservice.net can cause a visitor to leave your website permanently because he doesn't trust your website.

Webservices can also be consumed by other languages such as classic ASP , PHP and Java. And because each website is implementing it's own profile pages, it's also easier to implement an ajax-enabled forget password page for a specific website. Remember, ajax is not cool for WAP (mobile) sites.
Title: Well done   
Name: foton
Date: 12/20/2007 12:57:29 PM
Comment:
Clearly written and explained. Lots of players making big bucks marketing variations on this method. Your article will give us the jump-start we need to do this in-house.






Ads Powered by Lake Quincy Media
Community Advice: ASP | SQL | XML | Regular Expressions | Windows


©Copyright 1998-2008 ASPAlliance.com  |  Page Processed at 7/5/2008 1:32:59 PM  AspAlliance Recent Articles RSS Feed
About ASPAlliance | Newsgroups | Advertise | Authors | Email Lists | Feedback | Link To Us | Privacy | Search