Title:
Great effort.
Name:
Atul Kumar
Date:
6/13/2008 10:14:40 PM
Comment:
Excellent clarification of the concept.
|
Title:
Feedback
Name:
Brendan Enrick
Date:
5/28/2008 10:00:02 AM
Comment:
@DHIVYAA Well, I am sorry you feel that way. I've tried to write an article which would be easy for people to understand and grasp the concept of an interface. Perhaps you could let me know what it is that you do not like, and I could make an attempt at improving the quality of the article.
|
Title:
INTERFACE
Name:
DHIVYAA
Date:
5/28/2008 6:52:42 AM
Comment:
VERY WORST
|
Title:
Just reviewing
Name:
Dale
Date:
5/21/2008 1:54:23 PM
Comment:
I'm trying to swallow all the .Net now that I have finally made the switch. I read, read, and then short articles like you made, turn the light on for me. I can see !
|
Title:
interface
Name:
zahir
Date:
4/10/2008 6:28:50 AM
Comment:
No at all great but some what ok
|
Title:
interface
Name:
bala
Date:
3/19/2008 6:50:33 AM
Comment:
No at all great but some what ok
|
Title:
Interfaces
Name:
santosh kumar patro
Date:
3/16/2008 11:08:27 AM
Comment:
Thnx very much sir for your help regarding Interfaces.
|
Title:
this.title.new
Name:
this.user.next
Date:
2/29/2008 3:51:43 AM
Comment:
Why the need for all those small parts? It all could have been one whole part.. it irritates me to see all those parts and that too so small??
|
Title:
Excellent Article
Name:
Manpreet
Date:
2/22/2008 3:38:03 AM
Comment:
Excellent article..keep up the good work.
|
Title:
Great job
Name:
George
Date:
2/18/2008 12:57:35 AM
Comment:
its a great interface document
a guy like me know now how to use interfaces
thanks
|
Title:
interface
Name:
chaitu
Date:
1/22/2008 4:23:52 AM
Comment:
it is very help full
|
Title:
Very good explanation, please provide more like this !!!
Name:
Stefan
Date:
1/16/2008 3:47:00 AM
Comment:
It was really a pleasure for me to read this. Not many people are able to explain it that understandable like you did! And it's quite often the most basic things that are confusing if not understood completely.
To those who criticised: be honest and admit that somtimes there's something like this which enlights your priggish minds ;-)
|
Title:
excellent
Name:
Amit
Date:
1/2/2008 2:06:51 AM
Comment:
It is very help full.
|
Title:
very good article
Name:
Mohsen
Date:
12/28/2007 4:38:40 PM
Comment:
yes you've made it very easy understandable ,, thank you
|
Title:
Very informative
Name:
Farrukh
Date:
12/22/2007 2:25:23 AM
Comment:
Yes, you have defined it in a much better and easy and a friendly way.
I was never clear even about its definition by ready books.
Thanks
|
Title:
Interface
Name:
Arvind Gupta
Date:
12/21/2007 10:14:14 AM
Comment:
Very UseFull !
sr_arvind@yahoo.com
|
Title:
Better than Mine
Name:
Buddy Lindsey
Date:
12/18/2007 9:00:53 PM
Comment:
I think that you did a better job explaining interfaaces for beginners than I did on my blog.
http://www.buddylindsey.com/Blog/post/2007/11/Real-World-Interfaces-in-C.aspx
|
Title:
Static Methods
Name:
Brendan
Date:
12/13/2007 9:50:33 AM
Comment:
You can read some more about this on my blog post where I talk about this and go int more details about the topic.
http://aspadvice.com/blogs/name/archive/2007/12/13/Static-Methods-and-Interfaces-in-C_2300_.aspx
|
Title:
Static Methods
Name:
Brendan
Date:
12/13/2007 8:55:20 AM
Comment:
Jan,
One important thing to understand about static methods is that they don't really need to be tied to classes. Static methods basically just exist for convenience.
An interface is as the name says an interface to something. Think of it like an automobile interface. There are defined ways of working with the car. They have a steering wheel a gas pedal and brakes. An interface defines that and all automobiles will have those, but an interface doesn't define anything about "cars in general" (static) it defines what will be the interface for individual cars (instances).
I hope that makes sense,
Brendan
|
Title:
what about static functions?
Name:
Jan
Date:
12/13/2007 7:32:28 AM
Comment:
All my classes implementing my interface should have a static funtion.
Why can't I have a static function in an interface???
|
Title:
It finally sinks in
Name:
acousticsatellite
Date:
12/11/2007 10:27:56 AM
Comment:
I have read several articles on Interfaces. Finally I understand their usage. The portion on swapping out the DataReader is what made things click.
|
Title:
Refreshingly well written
Name:
foton
Date:
12/7/2007 12:53:23 PM
Comment:
It's nice to read an article in which the author writes clearly and well. Nice job. I hope others will follow your example.
|
Title:
Designed for beginners
Name:
Brendan
Date:
12/7/2007 9:05:25 AM
Comment:
Yes, I designed this article to be for beginners. I'll be writing more advanced articles on this same topic later.
|
Title:
Useful link for naive users
Name:
Uday D
Date:
12/7/2007 12:31:08 AM
Comment:
Helpful for naive C# programmers. Should have taken a better example.
|
